Christ and Christmas
the Truth and the Lie
John 1:1-10 In the beginning was the Word, and
the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the
beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him
was not anything made that was made. In him was life; and the
life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness;
and the darkness comprehended it not. There was a man sent from
God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness to bear
witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.
He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.
That was the true Light which lighteth every man that cometh into
the world.
This is the one of whose birth we are supposed to
celebrate at this time of year.
"The one who was the true light that lighteth
every man that cometh into the world. He was in the world and
the world was made by him and the world knew him not. He came
to his own and his own received him not." (John
1:9-11).
And that is just as true today as it ever was. Almost
everyone in the world, at least in our society in our country,
will come together to celebrate his birth—some with the knowledge
of him as their Lord and Saviour and others as rank Christ rejecters.
They want nothing really to do with his death, his burial, his
resurrection, and his life for them. But this is a nice time to
come together, have warm thoughts of each other, give gifts and
sell gifts. There are a lot of people who get very enthusiastic
at this time of year, primarily because they want to sell, which
makes them money. This is the time of year that, many in the retail
trade say, can actually make or break the year for them, November
through December.
The world doesn't know him today any more than it
did then. And the Christ whose birthday they allegedly celebrate
is not the Christ that I love, not the Christ that died for me.
It is some other Christ.
John 1:12-17: "But as many as received him,
to them gave he power to become the sons of God even to them that
believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the
will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. And the
Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory
the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace
and truth. John bare witness of him, and cried, saying. This was
he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before
me; for he was before me. For the law was given by Moses, but
grace and truth came by Jesus Christ."
When we think about the Lord Jesus Christ, those
two characteristics, those two attributes are truly characteristic
of him. Grace, unmerited favor extended to me and to you as the
Lord Jesus Christ suffered and died for my sins. Grace and truth—truth.
Years later, after his birth, he was standing before Pilate. Pilate
asked a question, "What is truth?" And that is certainly
a question that many people in the world today ask, "What
is truth?" What all prompted, or was behind, that expression
on Pilate's part?
Look at John 18 and let's look at that context a
little bit. What all was in his mind? The Roman government at
that time, as I understand it, was favorable to the worship of
any and all gods. They had conquered many nations and with them
of course came many beliefs. Many idolatrous gods were worshiped.
Many pagan deities were worshipped. The goal of the Roman government
was, basically, to get all people everywhere to live peaceably,
under their control and government. Therefore, they wanted to
appease all the gods. And Pilate, undoubtedly, had some background
and some understanding of that.
Let's look at John 18:33-37:
"Then Pilate entered into the judgment hall
again, and called Jesus, and said unto him, Art thou the King
of the Jews? Jesus answered him, Sayest thou this thing of thyself,
or did others tell it thee of me? Pilate answered, Am I a Jew?
Thine own nation and the chief priests have delivered thee unto
me: what has thou done? Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this
world; if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants
fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now is
my kingdom not from hence. Pilate therefore said unto him, Art
thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king.
To this end I was born, and for this cause came I into the world,
that I should bear witness unto the truth."
This is the reason I was born. This is why I came
into the world, to "bear witness of the truth. Everyone
that is of the truth heareth my voice." And, of course,
that means that Christians should be of truth, right? We should
be of truth. We have heard the voice of the Lord Jesus Christ
as he called, "Come unto me all ye that labor and are
heavy laden..", and we have accepted that call. And so
a characteristic of our lives should be as his life of truth,
and the Lord said that he came to bear witness of the truth. Pilate
said unto him, "What is truth?" I am sure that Pilate
had, throughout his life, heard all kinds theologies and all kinds
of theories as to how to please God and how to be accepted of
God. In fact, Pilate was probably well aware of the very roots
of the celebration of Christmas. He probably was well aware of
it because it far predates the birth of the Lord Jesus Christ.
There is no historical question about it.
I will read from material that I have never read
from before. It is on the subject of Christmas, its carols and
its legends. It is much easier reading than Hislop's, The Two
Babylons, which I have read before. It clearly indicates that,
basically, everything that is a part of the celebration of Christmas
has pagan origin and goes back well beyond the birth of the Lord
Jesus Christ. Pilate knew that. And the Roman government was involved
in trying to keep peace among all the various pagan deities, wanting
them to get along with each other, not to argue and fight. In
their system of government, they deferred to all pagan gods and
goddesses and the various holidays that were a part of it. Pilate
had that background. And so when the Lord Jesus Christ said that
he came to bear witness of the truth, Pilate had reason, undoubtedly,
to say, "Well, what is truth?" And exactly the same
thing is true today. As most of the world sees Christendom (I
use that term to describe religion that claims to be based on
the Bible), it sees the mixture of paganism, heathenism, Judaism
and Christianity, all mixed into a big stew. Lies and truths all
mixed together and spoken by the same people. People have every
reason to back off and say, "What is truth?"
Hopefully, I can illustrate more surely what I am
thinking about as we go on. Pilate is there before the Lord Jesus
Christ, the one by whom came truth. "The law was given
by Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ."
Turn back to John chapter 4. This is the account of the woman
at the well. The Lord has asked her for a drink of water. Then
he told her that if she knew who had asked her for a drink that
she would have asked of him a drink. He told her that the water
he could give her would spring up into ever lasting life and she
would never thirst again. She wanted to know where he would draw
the water from because the well was deep and he did not have anything
to draw the water with. Finally he, I think, focuses her attention
on what he is really addressing—her spiritual thirst—when
he tells her to go get her husband and she says, "I don't
have a husband." And he said, "It is well said you don't
have a husband because you have had five husbands and the man
you are now living with is not your husband." Then she realized
that he wasn't simply talking about H2O but that he was talking
about the spiritual thirst that she, and everyone else has, until
they accept Jesus Christ as their Saviour.
Shortly after that she goes on:
John 4:19-23. "The woman saith unto him,
Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet. Our fathers worshipped
in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where
men ought to worship. Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me,
the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet
at Jerusalem, worship the Father. Ye worship ye know not what:
we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews. But the
hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshipers shall worship
the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such
to worship him. "
If you are going to worship the Father, you are going
to have to worship him in spirit and in truth. Again, if we are
going to bring honor to the Lord Jesus Christ, in anything that
we do, it is going to have to be something that is true, a part
of truth. It can't be a lie, or a part of a lie, or a mixture
of truth and lies. It's got to be true!
John 4:23. "But the hour cometh, and now
is, when the true worshipers shall worship the Father in spirit
and in truth; for the Father seeketh such to worship him."
Those are the kind of people that the Father wants
to worship him. Now look at John 14:3-6. "And if I go
and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you
unto myself, that where I am, there ye may be also. And whither
I go ye know, and the way ye know. Thomas saith unto him, Lord,
we know not whither thou goest; and how can we know the way? Jesus
saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life; no man
cometh unto the Father, but by me."
So we find that the Lord Jesus Christ said, "I
have come to bear witness of the truth." It was said of him
that by him came truth. He said, "If people are going to
worship me, true worshipers will worship in spirit and in truth."
And here he said, "I am the way, the truth and the life."
So if we are going to do anything that will be honoring to the
Lord Jesus Christ, it is going to have to be what? TRUTH! If it's
not true, it won't be honoring to the Lord Jesus Christ.
Now somebody tell me, what is the story of Christmas?
What is supposed to have happened on the 25th of December? Santa
Claus comes down the chimney. Christ was supposed to have been
born. So the story is that Christ was born on December 25th. Right?
And the story is that on December 25th Santa Claus comes down
the chimney. Three wise men came to visit the Lord Jesus Christ
in a manger in Bethlehem. The wise men brought gifts to him. King
Herod was looking for him. Santa flies from the North Pole and
drops gifts at every house where the children have been good—in
one night! There was no room at the inn. It sounds like a jigsaw
puzzle scattered all over the place.
Of all that has been said so far, how much is true?
Jesus was born in Bethlehem. King Herod was looking for him. The
wise men brought gifts. Other than that, virtually everything
else said, as far as what is part of the Christmas story, is not
true. When a child grows up, they are going to be in the same
place that Pilate was. They are going to ask, "What is truth?"
Because there are some other parts of the story that are true.
It is true that the Lord Jesus Christ was born. That's true. Also,
the Bible tells us that he was born of a virgin. That's true.
But that's just as hard to believe as it is to believe that Santa
Claus comes down a chimney or manages to get down all the chimneys
all over the world from the North Pole in the same 12-hour period
of time or less. That's almost as hard to believe. That's almost
as hard to believe—and yet it's true. And if you are going to
believe it, you are going to believe it by faith. But if you've
had your faith affected already, before you've come to the place
where you can believe it, because somebody has lied to you, then
that's going to be hard to believe. Also it's a fact that the
Lord Jesus Christ lived a perfect, flawless life under the Mosaic
law. He did no sin; there was no guile found in his mouth. That
is hard to believe! It is a fact that Jesus Christ was Emmanuel,
that being interpreted, "God with us." That is
hard to believe.
And you come along later in life, and you run into
a Jehovah's Witness, and he points out to you the story you were
told when you were a kid, about Santa Claus and Christmas and
Christ being born on December 25th, was all a lie. And now you
are an adult and you realize that, yes, it was a lie. It really
wasn't Santa Claus; it was my mother and dad. Mark told us that
when he was a boy, he was told that if you opened your eyes, between
the time you went to bed and got up the next morning, Santa Claus
would put pepper in them. The legend and the lie have a lot of
facets and are only limited by the imagination of the particular
parents or preacher or whoever is promoting the legend. But you
run into a Jehovah's Witness and he is pretty slick. He knows
his stuff and you will have to admit that you have been conned.
They've had an ad running on the Fredericksburg radio
a couple of times. A little girl goes into a furniture store and
she wants to ask a question. So he immediately tells something
about the finance program and she says, "No, that's not the
question." He said, "What do you want to ask me about?"
She wants to know if there is a Santa Claus. Well, he never does
answer the question. He won't answer the question but she says,
"You're saying that there is no Santa Claus." The next
ad that followed that one was similar. She came back in again
with the same question. About that time, Santa comes in the door,
"HO HO!" Now she is convinced that there really is a
Santa Claus, because he came in the door. Again, what are they
doing? They are promoting a lie.
But again, back to what I was saying. This JW points
out the fact that you were lied to about Christmas. They don't
celebrate Christmas. I spoke to a fellow that was picking up garbage
the other day. He asked, "Are you ready for Christmas?"
I said, "I guess I'm as ready as I'll ever be. I don't celebrate
Christmas. I love the Lord Jesus Christ and I read the Bible,
but I really don't find anywhere where I should celebrate his
birth. So I don't celebrate Christmas." He said, "Well
everybody has their own beliefs." He said that Mr. A., whom
he worked for, didn't celebrate it either and that he was a JW.
I said, "Well, I'm not a JW, but I don't celebrate Christmas."
I don't know how Mr. A. got to be a JW; but at some point in time,
he accepted the fact that Christmas was pagan and that the story
of the birth of Christ on the 25th of December was a lie. And
along with that, he may have been told that, actually, the fact
that Jesus Christ was Emmanuel, "God with us",
wasn't true either. And the fact that he rose from the dead wasn't
true either. And the fact that you can accept Jesus Christ as
your savior and be born again—that wasn't true either. And
right on down the line they go because that is what they (JWs)
teach. They do use the fact that they are accurate in their understanding
of the origin of the Christmas celebration. And so you wind up
with people who are vulnerable for that question, "What is
truth?"
Many who have accepted the Lord Jesus Christ as their
personal savior have allowed the devil, the god of this world,
through the Roman Catholic church, to come up with a mixture of
paganism and Christianity, that has been spiced and sweetened
up, by calling it the celebration of the birth of the Son of God,
rather than the sun in the heavens. They celebrate by the use
of trees, trinkets and things the pagans used for the purpose
of worshiping the sun but claim this is celebrating the birth
of Jesus Christ. They have allowed the devil to convince them
that they can do this and it can in some way be honoring to the
Lord Jesus Christ. In reality, it cuts the bottom right out from
under the credibility of the gospel of Jesus Christ. I believe
that if we were gripped by that and proved it to ourselves, then,
to me, it puts the whole celebration in a different light. It
isn't something that's not all that bad, that I don't do because
it doesn't honor the Lord. It's bad!! It's terrible!! It's one
of the tricks of the devil.
I'll read from this book titled Christmas in Carol,
Custom, and Legend. I won't try to read all of it, but it's
basically a song book. But in the front part of it and after each
section of carols, they make some effort to indicate where they
came from. The amazing thing to me is that the dishonesty and
the falsehood of the celebration of Christmas isn't something
that only I know, or that only we know, or that only we and the
JWs know. Everybody knows. Everybody knows, that has done any
studying on the subject. It's common knowledge; there is probably
not a religious leader in the world that doesn't know it. And
when you talk to them, they won't discuss it, in most cases, because
even though they know it, they're not going to change. After all,
they get more people to come to church at Christmas than at any
other time. Well fine—but what are you doing with what you're
apart of for the rest of the year? What effect is that going to
have on you? The writer here says:
"Christmas, the greatest of all festivals is
celebrated over the modern world through the observance of both
religious and secular customs which are a heritage of many centuries.
The Story of the Nativity has inspired songs, legends, and beliefs;
and these have been contributed by every land to the great treasury
of music and traditions which are now the background for Christian
observance. Yet there are many other elements, now an integral
part of the great celebration, which had their roots in pre-Christian
times."
In other words, they far predate the birth of the
Lord Jesus Christ. They were celebrated long before he was born.
"The beautiful tree, the green decorative sprays,
the fire, the lights, the spirit of good fellowship and gift giving
come down to us from pagan sources."
I only have partial objection to that. Maybe as they
are involved in the celebration of Christmas, that's a true statement.
But good fellowship doesn't come from pagan sources. True fellowship
can only be in our relationship with God. But I'm sure that what
they are describing as part of the Christmas celebration may come
from pagan sources.
"Christians took the most beautiful and appealing
things from pagan beliefs which had existed before Christianity
and endowed them with a new spirit."
Can you do that? As far as God is concerned? No!
The interesting thing is that, as you study the scripture, you
find that the sources from which they took "the most appealing
of pagan beliefs," as they put it, are the very sources and
are the very practices that God judged Israel for over and over
and over again. Many, many thousands
of people died at the hand of God because Israel
tried to practice some of these most appealing of customs.
"The customs were changed little, but the spirit
was new; and because of this new spirit—the spirit of God's
gift to man—the customs took on new beauty."
I don't know personally, from having researched it
myself, but I have been told that the title of Pope basically
means "bridge builder." He is in the business of building
bridges between paganism and Christianity, one thing and another,
and if you follow the history of the Roman Catholic church, that's
what they've done down through the years. They've built bridges.
But not to stand for truth! But to mix truth with error and make
what out of it? A lie! You can't mix truth and error and improve
the truth. Nor can you improve the error. You destroy the truth,
and the error is still an error.
"THE WORD CHRISTMAS. From the earliest days
of Christian churches, festivals celebrating the birth of Christ
have been held. In England this festival was known as Christes
messe which meant Christ's mass. From this comes the
word Christmas. It is often represented as XMAS
because X is the Greek equivalent of Ch and Ch
represents Christ."
So it goes back to Rome again. And when they use
the term Christians (I think we have discussed this in the past),
in most cases, historically, it is referring to Roman Catholics
because historians trace the so-called "Christian churches"
back to Rome. And so when they talk about the early church or
early Christians, they are talking about the Roman Catholic church.
You can't come to the word of God and find anybody celebrating
the Mass, to say nothing of Christ's Mass. There is no such thing.
The Bible teaches that Jesus Christ suffered once. And he doesn't
have to be offered time after time, in contrast to the sacrifices
that were offered under the law system—"but once in
the ages."
"THE DATE OF CHRISTMAS. The date of the celebration
of Christmas varied during early centuries of Christianity because
there was no historical record of the exact date of Christ's birth."
Let's stop for a minute and you think. What are we
told about this book (holds up the Bible), relevant to what it
provides for us, as far as instructions to serve the Lord and
praise the Lord? "All scripture is given by inspiration
of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction,
for instruction in righteousness that the man of God may be perfect
or mature thoroughly furnished unto all good works."
That is where? II Timothy 3:16-17. So if the statement is true,
and it is true that there isn't any historical basis for selecting
the 25th of December, then it would have to follow that we are
not told in the scriptures on what date he was born. Therefore,
it would have to follow that it isn't important for us to know.
And if you go one step further, since we're not told to celebrate
his birth and his word furnishes us to all good works, then it
would be obvious that to celebrate Christ's birth wouldn't be
a good work.
"The date of the celebration of Christmas varied
during the early centuries of Christianity because there was no
historical record of the exact date of Christ's birth. In some
churches it was observed in December, while others celebrated
it in January, April, or in May. Perhaps the winter solstice festival
of the pagan Romans, Gauls, Teutons, and Britons had much to do
with the establishment of the date of Christmas."
The writer says "perhaps," and I believe
this assumption is true because pagans celebrated the birth of
the sun at that exact time. Other secular history makes this clear.
I think the writer, who is obviously in favor of the celebration
of Christmas, does everything that can be done to put Christmas
in the best light and so suggests that this is what happened.
Well, I believe there is no doubt, what is described is exactly
what happened.
"The Northern people worshiped the sun as the
giver of life and light. Their festivals in its honor took place
near the shortest day of the year when the sun seemed to stand
still for twelve days before it began its upward climb which resulted
in Spring and the coming of new life to the world. In the North,
the sun was thought of as a wheel which was known as hweol,
and it is perhaps from this word that the term Yule was
derived. Among the Romans" (and I am not reading everything)
"the Saturnalia holiday lasted from December 17th
to December 24th. Another holiday was Kalends on January
1st which marked the beginning of the new year. Both of these
holidays were celebrated with feasting, great merriment and the
giving of gifts. Homes were decorated with evergreens."
And when they talk about great merriment, it is easy
to think that maybe that's very innocent merriment, but it really
wasn't. Those pagan holidays were characterized by immorality
of the grossest sort, and as part of it, there were rites of fertility
and things of that nature. It wasn't something that was innocent.
"In Pagan Rome, December 25th was celebrated
as the birthday of Mithras, a prophet of the sun worshipers. Perhaps
these Roman holidays had their influence in the selection of December
25th as Christ's birthday. Justification for the choice was given
by St. Chrysostom, Bishop of Constantinople at the end of the
fourth century. In a discourse he said, 'On this day also the
Birthday of Christ was lately fixed at Rome in order that
while the heathen were busy with their profane ceremonies, the
Christians might perform their sacred rites undisturbed. They
call this (December 25th), the Birthday of the Invincible One
(Mithras); but who is so invincible as the Lord? They call it
the Birthday of the Solar Disk, but Christ is the Sun of Righteousness.'
About 336 AD, the Church of Rome definitely fixed the 25th day
of December as the birthday of the Lord. Since the fifth century
most of the Christian world has celebrated that day as Christ's
Birthday."
So it has nothing to do with when Christ really was
born. Therefore, it's not true.
"Gradually, as certain pagan customs of holiday
celebrations were assimilated into the Christmas festival, the
activities took on gaiety and often frivolity.....In time there
was reaction to the more frivolous until in certain countries,
England for example, the observance of festivals was entirely
prohibited."
When the United States was settled, the celebration
of Christmas was an illegal activity. I don't believe that it
was just because of the frivolity that was involved. I believe
that, as a result of the reformation, many people realized that
the source was pagan and Roman Catholic, and thought, "We've
left Roman Catholicism in protest and we are not going to bring
their practices with us, such as Christmas and Easter and things
of that nature."
"CAROLS AND CAROLING. Some carols, evidently
of pagan origin, were adopted by Christians and given new words.
Many of the carols were danced as well as sung which kept them
from being approved by the church for centuries. The word carol
was associated with dancing until the 14th century. It is said
that St. Francis and his brethren sang simple carols at the first
presentation of a life-sized representation of the Nativity scene."
In the nativity scene, what do you find? Don't you
find three wise men, and you find them in a manger with the babe
and sometimes the shepherds, too, I guess. Is that true? Where
do we find the accounts of the birth of the Lord Jesus Christ?
In what books? Luke and Matthew. Mark and John don't have any
record of that part of Christ's life. Luke and Matthew. But when
you compare those two accounts, it's obvious that the shepherds
were told, by the angels, of the birth of Christ, when
he was at Bethlehem, at the time that he was born. And they found
him where? In a manger. In contrast, by the time the wise men
came, some time had lapsed. And when they found the Lord Jesus
Christ, they found him where? In a house.
How many wise men were there? Nobody knows. Why do
people assume there were three? Because they brought three types
of gifts, which in no way would indicate that there were just
three men. It could have been a hundred men for that matter. It
could have been 25. It could have been three. But there is no
reason to believe that it was three men. I don't think that three
men normally made it a practice to travel in that country, in
that way together, especially carrying gold, frankincense and
myrrh. They had as much trouble with robbers and that kind of
people as we do, in fact, maybe more.
"THE CRECHE. To inspire greater religious feeling,
and help in the interpretation of the story of the birth of Jesus,
St. Francis of Assisi conceived the idea of building a life-sized
representation of the Nativity scene. The Pope gave him permission
to do so, and in 1223 he built a full-sized stable next to his
church in Graecia, a village near Assisi, in Italy. In it he created
the Nativity scene with living people and animals. The people
who came were much impressed. From this beginning the idea spread
all over Europe. The creche was used in homes as well as in the
churches and through the ages it has been built in all forms,
large and small from the crudest to the most elaborate."
"THE THREE WISE MEN. The Three Wise men (also
referred to as the Three Kings and as the Magi) are always a part
of the Nativity scene. The story of their visit to the Christ
Child is told in St. Matthew, and they are in themselves familiar
symbols of Christmas. According to medieval legend, they were
Melchoir, King of Arabia, who brought a gift of gold; Gaspar,
King of Tarsus, who brought myrrh; and Balthasar, King of Ethiopia,
who brought frankincense."
That is according to legend, not the word of God.
"Some authorities believe that gift giving at
this time of the year was a carryover from the pagans. The Romans
gave presents during the celebrations of Saturnalia and of Kalends.
"CHARITY. Our present day custom of providing
for the less fortunate at Christmas is undoubtedly an outgrowth
of an old legend. This legend says that every Christmas Eve, the
Christ Child wanders all over the world asking for food, shelter,
and help."
Again, is that true?
"One of the possible origins of the idea that
Santa Claus descends the chimney to bring gifts has already been
given." One story was of this Roman Catholic who became St.
Nicholas. The story was that Nicholas heard of a man with three
daughters and the father didn't have enough money to make a dowry
for them so he was going to sell them. And so Nicholas dropped
three gold bags at three different times down a chimney so that
they could each have a dowry. And so they thought this story may
be one possible origin. The other story (there are at least two
others) associates this custom with the early German Goddess Hertha,
goddess of domesticity. "She was believed to descend the
chimney through the smoke and guide the tellers of fortunes. At
one time the Germans baked cakes in the form of a slipper which
was supposed to be that of Hertha; these were filled with gifts
for the children. In later times, it was the custom to clean the
chimney at the beginning of the New Year so that good luck could
enter the household. It is quite likely children were told that
if they were good, Santa Claus would come down the chimney and
bring them gifts.
"CHRISTMAS TREE. Of all Christmas symbols none
is more familiar than the Christmas tree. The decorating of the
Christmas tree is one of the most beloved Christmas customs and
prevails wherever trees are available in either living or artificial
form. From earliest times the ancients held nature in great
reverence."
What does the scripture say about that? In Romans
1 we read, that they "worshipped and served the creature
more than the creator."
"All things had their gods, among them water,
the meadows, and the trees. Evergreen, therefore was not only
for decorative purposes but because it was possible to thus bring
a part of nature indoors. For the feast of Bacchus in Roman times
trees were decorated with trinkets. Among the trinkets were masks
of Bacchus. Those trees toward which the wind turned the masks
were supposed to be endowed with great fertility. In the celebration
of the pagan Yule season, the ancient sun-worshiping Teutons are
said to have decorated fir trees, for they likened the sun to
the spreading and blossoming of a great tree. Some tell us that
our own Christmas tree decoration is symbolic of this celestial
sun tree of the ancient pagans; the lights represent the lightning,
the decorations the sun, the moon, and the stars, while the little
animals hung in the branches represent the sacrifice of animals
made to the sun god.
"THE MISTLETOE. Mistletoe was often hung over
the entrances to homes of the pagans in Scandinavian countries
to keep out evil spirits. An old Scandinavian myth tells of the
seemingly invulnerable god, Balder, who was struck down by a dart
made of mistletoe, and it was decreed that the plant must never
again be used as a weapon. Frigga, who was the Goddess of love,
henceforth, gave a kiss to anyone who passed under the mistletoe.
The Druids who were members of a pagan religious order in ancient
Gaul, Briton and Ireland held the mistletoe in such reverence
that if enemies met under it in the forest, a truce was declared
for the day. Later, among Christians, it came to symbolize the
healing power of Christ.
"THE YULE LOG. The Druids' custom was to light
fires during the Yule season to burn out the sins and evils of
the past year.
"BELLS. For centuries bells of churches of every
land have pealed forth the glad tidings of the birth of Jesus.
In medieval times, the bells tolled for an hour before midnight
on Christmas Eve, and then on the hour their voices changed to
a joyous ringing. The tolling was to warn the powers of Darkness
of the approaching of the birth of the Savior. It was believed
'the Devil died when Christ was born.'"
I wish that were true. But sad to say, it's not true.The
devil is alive and well today.
"And in England, the tolling was known as 'Tolling
the Devil's knell.' As a result, bells have become a part of our
Christmas decorations, mostly in imitation form. They are also
prominent in Christmas card designs."
Again, obviously, the writer has every intent to
support and encourage, rather than discourage, the celebration
of Christmas. But I think that, to me, to keep it simple, I think
we need to back off and just look at it and say, "Well, is
it true?" How much of the Christmas story is true? Again,
just to go back and reflect a little bit on the three wise men.
If you go to Matthew chapter 2 you will find that there were wise
men, and you will find that they brought gifts. They didn't come
to the manger. And it's interesting. Let's look at Matthew chapter
2. It's an interesting thing that while the shepherds were told
of peace on earth, good will towards men, it's also true that
for those mothers of Israel who had children two years old and
younger—males two years old and younger—
that was a sad day. Let's start with verse 1:
Matthew 2:1-7. "Now when Jesus was born in
Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there
came wise men from the east to Jerusalem. Saying, Where is he
that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the
east, and are come to worship him. When Herod the king had heard
these things, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. And
when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the
people together, he demanded of them where Christ should be born.
And they said unto him in Bethlehem of Judea; for thus it is written
by the prophet. And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Juda, art not
the least among the princes of Juda; for out of thee shall come
a Governor, that shall rule my people Israel. Then Herod, when
he had secretly called the wise men, determined from them what
time the star appeared."
What was he (Herod) trying to establish? At least
he is trying to establish the age of the child.
Matthew 2:8-11 "And he sent them to Bethlehem
and said, Go and search diligently for the young child, and when
ye have found him, bring me word again, that I may come and worship
him also. When they had heard the king, they departed, and lo
the star, which they saw in the east, went before them till it
came and stood over where the young child was. When they saw the
star, they rejoiced with exceeding great joy. And when they were
come into the house (not into the stable but into the house) they
saw the young child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped
him and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto
him gifts, gold, and frankincense, and myrrh."
How many of them were there? We don't know. To imply
that there were three doesn't seem to be reasonable and logical.
Matthew 2:12-14. "And being warned of God
in a dream that they should not return to Herod, they departed
into their own country another way. And when they were departed,
behold the angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream, saying,
Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and flee into
Egypt, and be thou there until I bring thee word; for Herod will
seek the young child to destroy him. When he arose, he took the
young child, and his mother by night, and departed into Egypt."
It's interesting how many times that the words "young
child" are used here.
Matthew 2:15-16. "And was there until the
death of Herod; that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of
the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my
son. Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men,
was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children
that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two
years old and under according to the time which he had diligently
enquire of the wise men."
There is no doubt, this wasn't a happy day for them.
And they would reflect back at that period of time and it wouldn't
be with joy and rejoicing. I think we generally forget that. But
the important thing was that it was two years old and under, and
I am sure he spanned more time than was necessary. In other words,
let's say, based on his calculations, that the child was possibly
a year old. By going two years, he picked up that much extra tolerance,
and going down to all of them under, he figured he could sweep
it clean—two years old and under.
So again, it is not an accurate representation of
the biblical account. Obviously, Santa Claus is a lie. And again,
when you think of the next most prominent celebration, it's very
similar because its origin is the same. That celebration, in the
so-called Christian religion, is the celebration of Easter, allegedly
celebrating the resurrection of Jesus Christ. What about Easter?
Most of the activities that are surrounding that celebration are
also from pagan origin, far predating the resurrection of the
Lord Jesus Christ. And then we cap it by telling kids that rabbits
lay eggs.
WHY? It's ridiculous! But that's what we tell them!
And so we take something that did happen—the Lord Jesus Christ
did suffer and did die and was raised the third day for our justification.
That's true! Then we mix with it a lot of things that have their
roots in paganism and idolatry that far predate the birth of the
Lord Jesus Christ, to say nothing of his resurrection. Again,
mixing a lie with truth. And then we add the little dimension
of the Easter bunny and the Easter eggs laid by rabbits, and then
we present that to children.
You think the god of this world is so blind, so stupid,
that he didn't know what he was doing when he did that? No, I
believe the opposite. He knew exactly what he was doing. And anytime
you take something that is true and pure and holy and you mix
that with a lie, something that is not true, you do not bring
honor and glory to the Lord Jesus Christ. Because truth came by
him. He came to bear witness to the truth. He was the truth. And
therefore, to try to serve him, to please him, we must say and
do what is true. Religion today (sectarian, denominational religion)
takes truth and mixes it with a lie, which they say is to promote
truth. All they do is discredit the truth.
And that's why we as Christians, as we come to realize
what is truth, need to hate that kind of sin, that kind of mixture.
One of the things that God did not want, never has wanted for
his people, was mixture. When you go back into the old scriptures,
as well as into the writing of the apostle Paul, separation of
truth from error is what God wanted. Over and over again, and
in many ways, he taught that. The nation Israel was not to sow
its fields with diverse kinds of seeds. Why? God wanted distinction.
They were not to wear clothes of diverse kinds of material. God
wanted separation and distinction. They weren't to inter-marry
with the nations of other lands. Why? God didn't want illegitimate
mixture. God didn't want his people Israel to take on the practices
that were authored by the Devil, the worship of pagan deities.
It's exactly what God didn't want. And that is exactly
what the devil has been able to do, with nominal Christianity
today. To mix truth with error. And it makes both a lie. It makes
it a dirty, vile thing.
Turn to Ephesians 4:25:
"Wherefore putting away lying, speak every
man truth with his neighbor; for we are members one of
another."
Put away lying! Speak truth. Look at Colossians chapter
3. We as Christians have no basis, no rhyme nor reason, that could
possibly justify participating in anything with the magnitude
of dishonesty in it that the celebration of Christmas and Easter
have.
Colossians 3:9-10. "Lie not one to another,
seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds; And have
put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image
of him that created him:"
There is no doubt that at this time of year, there
is much beautiful music written. The thought of giving to the
poor certainly would appeal to anyone. The joyful times of families
together, good food (too much food in many cases), times to visit
and times for mothers and wives to prepare and cook and look forward
to having all the family together in the family atmosphere and
all that. Certainly none could speak against those things. But
when they are mixed with a lie about really The most important
One that ever moved on this earth, the Lord Jesus Christ, then
you and I need to find another time to have those activities.
Certainly times of the family being together don't have to depend
on everybody in the world doing the same thing at the same time.
We can have those times among our own families—times for wives
and mothers and daughters and daughters-in-law to get together
and cook, to have time of fellowship and maybe even eating too
much. Those times don't have to be the times that the world dictates.
The god of this world, the devil, dictates, as he has created
through the Roman Catholic church a mixture of paganism and idolatry
and mixed it up in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ—to say
nothing of mixing it with the mass, the resurrection and crucifixion
of Jesus Christ. There is no place for those who know Jesus Christ
as their personal savior and who want to please Him to have any
part in that. And yet, the vast majority of people in the world
are like robots, lock- stepping down the road at this time of
the year to celebrate Christ's birthday.
Was Christ born in December? Probably not. I hope
everybody recognizes that. Most people know that it's not true.
If we pretend that he was, then down the road the god of this
world can begin to work on us. He certainly will work on our young
people if they are raised by parents who promote this lie. He
may be able to shake confidence in the truth because we believe
or promoted this lie. Will it cause them to trust what they read
from this book (holds up the Bible) when, in some way, they come
to realize that they have been deceived by parents and preachers
who said the Christmas story had its roots in the Bible? No! It
won't tend to cause them to trust what they would read from this
book. It will be inclined to cause them to say what the vast majority
of people in the world today say, educators and the educated,
particularly: that this (holding up the Bible) is a compilation
of myths and stories that were handed down from father to son
and father to son and finally somebody put them down in writing,
and then it was translated and re-translated and we don't know
whether it's accurate or not. Those deceived may feel that the
gospel is like a lot of other stories, like the story of Santa
Claus and the story of Christmas.
What is this lie doing? It's having its part in
sending souls to HELL—because it causes thinking people
to question, "What is truth?" relevant to the work of
the Lord Jesus Christ? The question is raised because "The
Truth" is mixed with "The Lie."
May God help all humble believers in the Lord Jesus
Christ to recognize him as LORD—and Savior and obey
Ephesians 5:11. "And have no fellowship with the unfruitful
works of darkness, but rather expose them."
For additional evidence as to the roots of the celebration
of Christmas see the following:
- Your encyclopedia.
- The Two Babylons, by Alexander Hislop.
- The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, by Gibbons.
- Read these related topics
- XMAS, the Diabolical Paradox
- Seasons Greetings
- Does Easter Glorify Christ?
- Happy Halloween?
|